<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Women&#039;s Health Line &#187; weight gain after hysterectomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.womenhealthline.com/tag/weight-gain-after-hysterectomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.womenhealthline.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cervix Removal Or Retaining During Hysterectomy – A Surgical Conundrum – Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.womenhealthline.com/cervix-removal-or-retaining-during-hysterectomy-a-surgical-conundrum-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.womenhealthline.com/cervix-removal-or-retaining-during-hysterectomy-a-surgical-conundrum-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ovaries & Womb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[total abdominal hysterectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaginal hysterectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight gain after hysterectomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womenhealthline.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a rising trend of sway towards the subtotal or supracervical hysterectomy (STH) approach noticed especially in the certain European countries.</p>
<p>The cervix retaining or sparing approach is beyond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a rising trend of sway towards the subtotal or <strong>supracervical hysterectomy (STH)</strong> approach noticed especially in the certain European countries.</p>
<p>The <strong>cervix </strong>retaining or sparing approach is beyond doubt, deemed technically uncomplicated and safer surgery in comparison to the total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). The reason being this approach averts the requirement to dissect through the vastly vascular para-vaginal cuff in close quarters to the ureter. The procedure is entirely an intra-peritoneal one and evades contact between the potentially contaminated vagina and abdominal cavity. There have been persistent suggestions that there direct outcomes of the approach are related with the clinical advantages.</p>
<p>A latest review has suggested that has been a greater inclination towards a cutback in surgical time, blood loss and post-operative febrile morbidity found in those women who underwent STH procedure. On the other hand, there were no marked disparities in grave morbidity rates or re-admissions subsequent to undergoing either STH or TAH procedures.</p>
<p>The other suggested reasoning towards retaining the cervix is better sexual, bowel and bladder function. Hysterectomy is known to disturb nerve plexuses and anatomical relations in the pelvic region. This has the likelihood to have an effect on the functioning of the pelvic organs comprising of the urinary bladder, bowel and the pelvic floor.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-96" style="padding: 3px;" title="Vaginal hysterectomy" src="http://www.womenhealthline.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/SubTotalHysterectomyCutIndicator-300x228.jpg" alt="Cervix Removal Or Retaining During Hysterectomy – A Surgical Conundrum – Part II" width="300" height="228" />An assessment suggestive of the fact that the STH procedure improves sexual function garnered significant media awareness in the West. But, this assertion failed to brace the intransigence of larger and superior-conducted randomised tests. Also, noted was that there was no variation in bowel or bladder function following either STH or TAH procedure.</p>
<p>Finally, the conclusions drawn were that the benefits of the STH approach to hysterectomy are restricted to the peri-operative phase. Possible advantages like a swifter post-operative recuperation and enhanced short term quality of life, particularly with the laparoscopic STH, must be verified by adeptly sized randomised tests.</p>
<p>On the other hand, there are no long-term benefits of retaining the cervix and post hysterectomy cervical cancer examination on regular intervals is compulsory. The perils of vaginal blood loss and recurrent symptoms are not counteracted by enhancements in pelvic organ or pelvic floor function. In such scenarios, there seems to be the strong bearing for TAH remaining the default hysterectomy in certain third world or underdeveloped countries where opportunities for cervical screening are inadequate.</p>
<img src="http://www.womenhealthline.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=95&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.womenhealthline.com/cervix-removal-or-retaining-during-hysterectomy-a-surgical-conundrum-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Scarring Belly Button Hysterectomy</title>
		<link>http://www.womenhealthline.com/non-scarring-belly-button-hysterectomy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.womenhealthline.com/non-scarring-belly-button-hysterectomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ovaries & Womb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belly button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysterectomy procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysterectomy side effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life after hysterectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side effects after a hysterectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight gain after hysterectomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womenhealthline.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lately, a path-breaking technique was employed by surgeons in Europe during a hysterectomy procedure that was conducted with a mere slit in the belly button area of the woman.</p>
<p>The foremost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, a path-breaking technique was employed by surgeons in Europe during a hysterectomy procedure that was conducted with a mere slit in the belly button area of the woman.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-16" style="padding: 3px;" title="Hysterectomy procedure" src="http://www.womenhealthline.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/stpierre-full-300x199.jpg" alt="Non-Scarring Belly Button Hysterectomy " width="287" height="192" />The foremost form of hysterectomy method carried out by the proficient panel of surgeons headed by Doctor Thomas Ind, is also called single incision laparoscopic surgery. This is the newest advancement in the field of knothole surgery wherein the device fitted with a mini-camera is introduced through the navel, with the aid of which the surgeons could manipulate the procedure within, by watching the live streaming on a television monitor.</p>
<p><strong>Hysterectomy</strong>, a common surgical procedure on women that entails the removal of the uterus or the womb is opted due to various maladies like the presence of uterine fibroids or prolapse, endometriosis, with nearly 10% cases for treatment of uterine cancer or acute pre-cancerous condition known as dysplasia.</p>
<p>The 46-year-old patient, Price on whom this revolutionary procedure – an expansion to the existent keyhole procedure was undertaken, was ailing from a history of adenomyosis – an agonizing condition  in which the lining of the womb abnormally grows extending into the uterus muscle. The patient found the keyhole technique of uterus removal quite favourable as it involves a singular puncture as compared to the regular three to four punctures done across the abdomen during routine hysterectomy.</p>
<img src="http://www.womenhealthline.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=15&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.womenhealthline.com/non-scarring-belly-button-hysterectomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

